Deliberative Democracies and Deliberative Conflict Resolution in the Divided Society

Taiwan Journal of Democracy, May 2013, Special Issue: pp.63-85

24 Pages Posted: 3 Dec 2014

Date Written: December 3, 2014

Abstract

In the twenty-first century, democracy is fundamental to the human condition in the way that it frames and influences debates on national identity and affords various devices and solutions. Democratic devices, including referendums, electoral engineering, and consociational arrangements, have expanded to resolve and manage conflicts arising from divided societies. This essay argues that deliberative democracy is needed to complement but not replace referendums and consociational models. The essay reviews nondemocratic and nondeliberative democratic approaches, and shows that the findings all point to a deliberative condition that frames new discourses and mechanisms for innovative conflict resolution. The essay then examines, compares, and combines various approaches to the studies of deliberative democracy. Different forms of public deliberation, such as citizen juries, deliberative polling, and intercommunity or ethnic-group dialogue, all are new democratic devices to supplement and improve existing democratic institutions. They are not meant to replace them.

Suggested Citation

He, Baogang, Deliberative Democracies and Deliberative Conflict Resolution in the Divided Society (December 3, 2014). Taiwan Journal of Democracy, May 2013, Special Issue: pp.63-85, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2533396

Baogang He (Contact Author)

Deakin University ( email )

School of Humanities and Social Sciences
Melbourne, Victoria 3217
Australia

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
114
Abstract Views
748
Rank
435,891
PlumX Metrics