Of ‘Landmark’ or ‘Leading’ Cases: Salomon's Challenge

41 Journal of Law and Society 523-550, 2014

41 Pages Posted: 11 Dec 2014

See all articles by Ernest Lim

Ernest Lim

National University of Singapore (NUS) - Faculty of Law

Date Written: December 1, 2013

Abstract

This article seeks to call into question the two dominant conceptions of ‘landmark’ or ‘leading’ cases in English legal scholarship by using the House of Lords decision in Salomon v Salomon Co Ltd. — the most famous case in corporate law — as a case study. It argues that neither the first dominant conception of ‘leading’ or ‘landmark’ cases, which is essentially characterized by the analysis of the intrinsic merits of a case, nor the second dominant conception, which looks at the historical contexts in which cases were decided, appears to be sufficient by itself to determine whether or not a case is landmark or canonical. Rather, we have to look at how the canonicity of a case is constructed by subsequent courts. The article seeks to advance the debate concerning the formation of landmark cases and aims to challenge certain prevailing views on the canonicity of corporate law’s arguably most significant case.

Keywords: Landmark cases; leading cases; canon; Salomon

Suggested Citation

Lim, Ernest, Of ‘Landmark’ or ‘Leading’ Cases: Salomon's Challenge (December 1, 2013). 41 Journal of Law and Society 523-550, 2014, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2536202

Ernest Lim (Contact Author)

National University of Singapore (NUS) - Faculty of Law ( email )

469G Bukit Timah Road
Eu Tong Sen Building
Singapore, 259776
Singapore

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
552
Abstract Views
2,160
Rank
92,807
PlumX Metrics