A Trio of Child Support Cases

4 Pages Posted: 12 Dec 2014 Last revised: 8 Jun 2019

See all articles by Bill Atkin

Bill Atkin

Victoria University of Wellington, Te Herenga Waka - Faculty of Law

Date Written: 2008

Abstract

The Child Support Act 1991 sits awkwardly in the framework of family law statutes in New Zealand. Governed by the Inland Revenue Department, it is not typical of legislation of its kind, as it does not expressly consider the best interests of the child. However, the cases of C v L [Child Abduction], Commissioner of Inland Revenue v DJP, and Inland Revenue Department v C, have all held that the best interests of the child can play a decisive role under the Act. This article explains why these cases typify the shortcomings of the Act, especially in terms of misconduct, and shows why wholesale changes to the legislation are needed.

Keywords: Family Law; Child Support; Welfare of Child; Law Reform

JEL Classification: K39

Suggested Citation

Atkin, Bill, A Trio of Child Support Cases (2008). (2008) 6 NZFLJ 107, Victoria University of Wellington Legal Research Paper No. 35/2019, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2536646

Bill Atkin (Contact Author)

Victoria University of Wellington, Te Herenga Waka - Faculty of Law ( email )

PO Box 600
Wellington, 6140
New Zealand

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
56
Abstract Views
493
Rank
670,101
PlumX Metrics