"The Federal Deposit Insurance Fund that Didn't Put a Bite on U.S. Tax Payers"
23 Pages Posted: 27 Dec 2000 Last revised: 15 Sep 2022
Date Written: February 1994
Abstract
Unlike the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation and the Bank Insurance Fund, the National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund (NCUSIF) entered the 1990s in a state of accounting solvency. This paper develops evidence to show the more important fact that NCUSIF remained solvent in a market-value sense as well. Differences in institutional product lines and risk-taking opportunities between credit unions and banks and thrifts are not consequential enough to explain the differences in their funds' health. This paper explains how differences in decisionmaking environments made managerial and regulatory risk-taking incentives in the credit-union industry diverge substantially from those governing banks and S&Ls. The differences in incentive structure support the hypothesis that private coinsurance could lessen taxpayer loss exposure elsewhere in the federal deposit insurance system.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
The Regulation and Supervision of Banks Around the World: A New Database
By James R. Barth, Gerard Caprio, ...
-
Does Deposit Insurance Increase Banking System Stability? An Empirical Investigation
-
Deposit Insurance and Financial Development
By Robert Cull, Lemma W. Senbet, ...
-
Deposit Insurance Around the Globe: Where Does it Work?
By Asli Demirgüç-kunt and Edward J. Kane
-
Deposit Insurance Around the Globe: Where Does it Work?
By Edward J. Kane and Asli Demirgüç-kunt
-
Market Discipline and Financial Safety Net Design
By Asli Demirgüç-kunt and Harry Huizinga
-
Deposit Insurance Around the World: A Comprehensive Database
By Asli Demirgüç-kunt, Baybars Karacaovali, ...
-
Deposit Insurance in Developing Countries
By Samuel Talley and Ignacio Mas