Asset Measurement in Imperfect Credit Markets

30 Pages Posted: 7 Jan 2015 Last revised: 6 Jun 2015

See all articles by Jeremy Bertomeu

Jeremy Bertomeu

Washington University in St. Louis - John M. Olin Business School

Edwige Cheynel

Washington University in St. Louis - John M. Olin Business School

Multiple version iconThere are 2 versions of this paper

Date Written: June 5, 2015

Abstract

How should a firm measure a productive asset used as collateral in a credit agreement? To answer this question, we develop a model in which firms borrow funds subject to collateral constraints. We characterize the qualities of optimal asset measurements and analyze their interactions with financing needs, collateral constraints and interest rates. Because of real effects, complete transparency would reduce contracting efficiency and, hence, the measurement must be suitably adapted to credit conditions. The optimal measurement is asymmetric and reports precise information about high collateral values if credit frictions are low, but the reverse if credit frictions are high. Tighter credit market conditions may lead to more opaque measurements and increased investment, in the form of inefficient continuations.

Keywords: liquidity, financing, collateral, capital, lending, accounting

JEL Classification: D8, G1, M4

Suggested Citation

Bertomeu, Jeremy and Cheynel, Edwige, Asset Measurement in Imperfect Credit Markets (June 5, 2015). Columbia Business School Research Paper No. 15-8, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2546041 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2546041

Jeremy Bertomeu (Contact Author)

Washington University in St. Louis - John M. Olin Business School ( email )

One Brookings Drive
Campus Box 1133
St. Louis, MO 63130-4899
United States

Edwige Cheynel

Washington University in St. Louis - John M. Olin Business School ( email )

One Brookings Drive
Campus Box 1133
St. Louis, MO 63130-4899
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
263
Abstract Views
2,898
Rank
213,292
PlumX Metrics