Sustaining Highly-Fragile Collaborations: A Study of Planning Mega Infrastructure Projects in the UK

45 Pages Posted: 30 Jan 2015

See all articles by Nuno A. Gil

Nuno A. Gil

The University of Manchester

Date Written: January 29, 2015

Abstract

This study discusses the sustainability of highly-fragile, consensus-oriented developments which rely on voluntary contributions of resources. The research is grounded on a dataset of interorganizational controversies that arose during the planning of four mega infrastructure projects in the UK. It uses Design Structure Matrices to qualify the decomposability of the design structures and of the structures that govern high-level decisions to set performance expectations. The analysis shows that fixed deadlines, tight budgets and equity concerns constrain efforts to decentralise governance and seek local consensuses. Time constraints also bring to the fore mutual-gains bargaining and compromise-seeking despite genuine efforts to engage in deliberative decision-making and effective collaboration. Hence, I argue, sustaining these pluralistic enterprises is per se a measure of positive performance. The study suggests four mechanisms that allow carrying the parties along as the development inches forward: loosening local targets, global buffers, flexible designs in use; and an umpire — an actor accountable to all parties and empowered to settle disputes.

Keywords: collective action, design, governance, projects, infrastructure

Suggested Citation

Gil, Nuno A., Sustaining Highly-Fragile Collaborations: A Study of Planning Mega Infrastructure Projects in the UK (January 29, 2015). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2557370 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2557370

Nuno A. Gil (Contact Author)

The University of Manchester ( email )

Oxford Road
Manchester, N/A M13 9PL
United Kingdom

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
245
Abstract Views
1,221
Rank
226,986
PlumX Metrics