How to Be Critical

20 Pages Posted: 19 Feb 2015

Date Written: October 01, 2000

Abstract

This work is a contribution to a symposium: Philosophical Hermeneutics and Critical Legal Theory. The central question for this essay is the following: Given the nature of critical activity and theory, how can one be critical? My thesis is that Hans-Georg Gadamer's philosophical hermeneutics, when combined with Jurgen Habermas's communicative (or discourse) theory or Jacques Derrida's deconstruction, can guide us toward critical activity. The article summarizes philosophical hermeneutics and examines the relationship between Gadamer's hermeneutics and critical legal activity. Philosophical hermeneutics explains, on the one hand, how we can come to understand critical concepts and, on the other hand, how being critical can be a difficult task. It then explores first, how Habermas's discourse theory and second, how Derrida's deconstruction can supplement philosophical hermeneutics to help engender critical activity.

Keywords: philosophical hermeneutics, critical legal theory, Hans-Georg Gadamer, Jurgen Habermas, Jacques Derrida

Suggested Citation

Feldman, Stephen Matthew, How to Be Critical (October 01, 2000). Chicago-Kent Law Review, Vol. 76, No. 893, 2000, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2566361

Stephen Matthew Feldman (Contact Author)

University of Wyoming - College of Law ( email )

P.O. Box 3035
Laramie, WY 82071
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
46
Abstract Views
384
PlumX Metrics