Demand for 'The 1%':Tax Incidence and Implications for Optimal Income Tax Rates

47 Pages Posted: 19 Feb 2015 Last revised: 24 Feb 2015

See all articles by Richard K. Green

Richard K. Green

University of Southern California - Lusk Center for Real Estate

Mark Phillips

University of Southern California - Sol Price School of Public Policy

Date Written: February 1, 2015

Abstract

We develop a model for determining the optimal high income linear tax rate when there exist imperfectly substitutable types of labor. If one type is disproportionately prevalent among higher income taxpayers, then wages adjust in response to more progressive taxation and part of the statutory tax burden is shifted to lower income taxpayers. Our derivation is expressed in terms of readily interpretable elasticity and income distribution parameters which we use to estimate the optimal top tax rate under various plausible alternatives. We reject the notion from the previous literature that wage adjustments are costly enough (from a social welfare perspective) to warrant non-progressive taxation, much less subsidization of high income taxpayers. However, we also estimate that the optimal tax rate may be significantly smaller than when incidence effects are ignored, and may in fact be quite similar to current rates under U.S. policy.

Keywords: Optimal income taxation, tax incidence, income distribution

JEL Classification: H21, H22, H23, J21, J22, J23

Suggested Citation

Green, Richard K. and Phillips, Mark, Demand for 'The 1%':Tax Incidence and Implications for Optimal Income Tax Rates (February 1, 2015). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2566548 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2566548

Richard K. Green

University of Southern California - Lusk Center for Real Estate ( email )

2250 Alcazar Street
Los Angeles, CA 90089
United States

Mark Phillips (Contact Author)

University of Southern California - Sol Price School of Public Policy ( email )

Lewis Hall 300
650 Childs Way
Los Angeles, CA 90089-0626
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
79
Abstract Views
813
Rank
559,428
PlumX Metrics