Putty Capital and Clay Labor: Differing European Union Capital and Labor Freedom Speeds in Times of European Migration

The New School Economic Review, 8, 3, 147-168, 2016; authorized reprint: American Review of Political Economy, 11, 1, 96-120.

30 Pages Posted: 24 Feb 2015 Last revised: 5 Apr 2017

See all articles by Julia M. Puaschunder

Julia M. Puaschunder

Columbia University; New School for Social Research; Harvard University; The Situationist Project on Law and Mind Sciences

Date Written: February 23, 2015

Abstract

Globalization led to unprecedented risks stemming from global interconnectedness. Economic trade may distribute benefits of international exchange unevenly due to fundamental barriers of distance, national borders and implicit market segmentation. In order to equalize trade prosperity, the European Union (EU) 4 freedoms of goods, services, capital and labor are established by a neoliberal policy framework and the Eurozone featuring a common currency. While there is a vital central monetary union and since the 2008/09 World Financial Crisis a common European fiscal pact, EU free trade is limited regarding labor mobility. Explicit labor transfer constraints comprise of work permission requirements and sector specific restrictions while implicit drawbacks arise due to specific language, cultural and skill requirements. The paper addresses risks emerging from labor immobility in combination with more vital capital and goods movements. Within the European compound, full capital flows and export opportunities may gravitate trade benefits towards original EU core countries, while periphery countries that became later part of the EU are shunned from full employment productivity. A less mobile workforce in the EU periphery is described as a reserve army of labor with social problems invisible to the core union as for remaining out of focus due to national borders and geographic distance. Trade movements within the EU are analyzed with attention to export, unemployment as well as migration patterns in order to advocate for attention to full labor freedom within the EU following the greater goal of Ricardian fair and mutually-beneficial trade enabled through a harmonious interplay of national government and European governance polity.

Keywords: Capital freedom, Emergent risk, European 4 freedoms, Globalization, Goods Freedom, Labor freedom, Labor immobility, Trade

Suggested Citation

Puaschunder, Julia M., Putty Capital and Clay Labor: Differing European Union Capital and Labor Freedom Speeds in Times of European Migration (February 23, 2015). The New School Economic Review, 8, 3, 147-168, 2016; authorized reprint: American Review of Political Economy, 11, 1, 96-120., Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2568637 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2568637

Julia M. Puaschunder (Contact Author)

Columbia University ( email )

3022 Broadway
New York, NY 10027
United States

New School for Social Research ( email )

6 East 16th Street
New York, NY 10003
United States

Harvard University ( email )

24 Oxford Street
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

The Situationist Project on Law and Mind Sciences ( email )

24 Oxford Street
Cambridge, MA 02138
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
55
Abstract Views
675
Rank
670,186
PlumX Metrics