The Separation of Questions of Law and Fact in the New Russian and Spanish Jury Verdicts

The Judicial Role in Criminal Proceedings, Sean Doran & John D. Jackson, eds., pp. 51-63, 2000

12 Pages Posted: 1 Mar 2015

See all articles by Stephen C. Thaman

Stephen C. Thaman

Saint Louis University - School of Law

Date Written: 2000

Abstract

This article discusses the division of labor between the judge and the jury in rendering judgment, and the separation of law and fact historically and currently, focusing on Spain and Russia. Both Russia and Spain rejected the Anglo-American general verdict of “guilty” or “not-guilty” in favor of a list of questions or propositions presented to the jury during their criminal procedure reforms of the 1990’s. This article also delves into the jury deliberation, verdict, and judgment process of the two countries.

Suggested Citation

Thaman, Stephen C., The Separation of Questions of Law and Fact in the New Russian and Spanish Jury Verdicts (2000). The Judicial Role in Criminal Proceedings, Sean Doran & John D. Jackson, eds., pp. 51-63, 2000, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2571476

Stephen C. Thaman (Contact Author)

Saint Louis University - School of Law ( email )

100 N. Tucker Blvd.
St. Louis, MO 63101
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
51
Abstract Views
354
Rank
699,035
PlumX Metrics