Equality of Opportunity: Theory and Evidence

42 Pages Posted: 20 Apr 2016

See all articles by Francisco H. G. Ferreira

Francisco H. G. Ferreira

World Bank - Development Research Group (DECRG)

Vito Peragine

Università degli Studi di Bari “Aldo Moro” (UNIBA)

Multiple version iconThere are 3 versions of this paper

Date Written: March 20, 2015

Abstract

Building on earlier work by political philosophers, economists have recently sought to define a concept of equity that accommodates the fairness of reward to individual responsibility and effort, while allowing for the existence of some inequalities which are unfair and should be compensated. This paper -- commissioned as a chapter for the Oxford Handbook of Well Being and Public Policy -- provides a critical review of the economic literature on equality and inequality of opportunity. A simple' canonical model' of equal opportunity is proposed, and used to explore the two fundamental concepts in this (relatively) new theory of social justice: the principles of compensation and reward. Ex-ante and ex-post versions of the compensation principle are presented, and the tensions between them are discussed. Different approaches to the measurement of inequality of opportunity -- and empirical applications -- are reviewed, and implications for the measurement of poverty and of the rate of economic development are discussed.

Keywords: Economic Theory & Research, Gender and Law, Inequality, Equity and Development, Poverty Impact Evaluation

Suggested Citation

Ferreira, Francisco H. G. and Peragine, Vito, Equality of Opportunity: Theory and Evidence (March 20, 2015). World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 7217, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2581774

Francisco H. G. Ferreira (Contact Author)

World Bank - Development Research Group (DECRG) ( email )

1818 H. Street, N.W.
MSN3-311
Washington, DC 20433
United States
202-473-4382 (Phone)

Vito Peragine

Università degli Studi di Bari “Aldo Moro” (UNIBA) ( email )

Piazza Umberto I
Bari, 70121
Italy

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
255
Abstract Views
1,211
Rank
27,812
PlumX Metrics