Case Comment, City of Chicago v. Morales: Street Gangs, Public Spaces, and the Limits of Police Discretion

5 Tex. Hisp. J.L. & Pol'y 105 (2001)

24 Pages Posted: 12 Apr 2015 Last revised: 2 Dec 2019

Abstract

This Note examines a 1999 opinion by the U.S. Supreme Court about a controversial gang-loitering ordinance passed seven years earlier in Chicago, Illinois. After setting the pre-litigation historical stage, it recounts how scores of Chicagoans successfully challenged the ordinance’s constitutionality in the state courts; scrutinizes the text of the ordinance, paying particular attention to how critical terms are defined; analyzes the U.S. Supreme Court’s six-to-three opinion, addressing some of the views expressed by the dissenters; and evaluates why a revised ordinance is doomed, outlining a viable and legitimate extra-legal alternative for reducing harmful street gang loitering. It ends by cogitating on the ramifications of the Court’s opinion.

Keywords: Chicago, fair notice, loiter, minimal guidelines, ordinance, police, street gangs, vagueness

Suggested Citation

Sturgeon, Roy L., Case Comment, City of Chicago v. Morales: Street Gangs, Public Spaces, and the Limits of Police Discretion. 5 Tex. Hisp. J.L. & Pol'y 105 (2001), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2593090

Roy L. Sturgeon (Contact Author)

Independent Scholar ( email )

United States

HOME PAGE: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5116-1002

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
40
Abstract Views
470
PlumX Metrics