A Response to Professor Tan's Review of Legal Orientalism

Harvard Law Review Forum, Forthcoming

Emory Legal Studies Research Paper No. 15-353

6 Pages Posted: 2 May 2015

See all articles by Teemu Ruskola

Teemu Ruskola

University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School; University of Pennsylvania - School of Arts & Sciences

Date Written: 2015

Abstract

This piece is a response to Professor Carol Tan’s “How a ‘Lawless’ China Made Modern America: An Epic Told in Orientalism,” 128 Harvard Law Review 1677 (2015). In her extensive review article, Tan provides a capacious analysis of my book “Legal Orientalism: China, the United States, and Modern Law” (Harvard University Press 2013). Beyond synthesizing my key arguments and providing an analytic map of the book’s main contentions, she enhances them by supplying a great deal of supplemental historical information. Rather than commenting on the specifics of Tan’s detailed review, this response expands upon and clarifies a few of the main arguments with which Tan is most engaged. Insofar as Tan’s review introduces historical background not referenced in my analysis, considering such additional material allows this response to focus on some matters that I could not address within the scope of the book.

Suggested Citation

Ruskola, Teemu, A Response to Professor Tan's Review of Legal Orientalism (2015). Harvard Law Review Forum, Forthcoming, Emory Legal Studies Research Paper No. 15-353, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2600728

Teemu Ruskola (Contact Author)

University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School ( email )

Philadelphia, PA 19104
United States

University of Pennsylvania - School of Arts & Sciences ( email )

Philadelphia, PA 19104
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
238
Abstract Views
874
Rank
235,319
PlumX Metrics