History in Legal Doctrine. Vattel and Réal De Curban on the Spanish Succession.

Forthcoming in: D. De ruysscher, B. Deseure, K. Capelle, M. Colette & G. Van Assche (eds.), Rechtsgeschiedenis op nieuwe wegen. Legal history, moving in new directions. Antwerp: Maklu, 2015. 

22 Pages Posted: 3 Jun 2015

See all articles by Frederik Dhondt

Frederik Dhondt

Research Group CORE (Contextual Research in Law); Legal History Institute/Gustave Rolin Jaequemyns Institute of International Law (GRILI)

Date Written: June 1, 2015

Abstract

The War of the Spanish Succession (1701-1713/1714) counts as a continent- and even world-spanning confrontation among the main European powers. Its long shadow hung over diplomacy for almost three decades until a new world conflagration arose in 1740. The war remains a subject of controversy in diplomatic history, and has been of paramount importance to contemporary eighteenth-century journalists, historians, philosophers and legal scholars. "La dernière guerre" counted as an anti-norm, a situation never to return to, and a permanent deterrent. Yet, as time progressed another conflicts dominated the world stage, the conflict became an object of legal writing, as it seemingly lost much of its contentiousness. Emer de Vattel (1717-1767), author of the much-acclaimed Droit des gens (Leiden: 1757) and abbot Réal de Curban (1682-1752), whose Science du Gouvernement (Paris: les libraires associés, 1764) covers the law of nations as well, took the war as an object to illustrate diverse themata of the law of nations: treaties, ius ad bellum, embassies or alliances. The aim of the present paper is to demonstrate how Vattel, writing from a specific Swiss and German perspective, took a different strand of argumentation from that of Réal de Curban, who repeated at several instances the French crown's point of view. Although both authors' use of historical material evokes strict objectivity, they continued the war in their selective use of exempla. Whereas Réal has fallen into relative oblivion, Vattel counts among the classics of International Law. Consequently, the image of the war in doctrine tends to be one-sided. Incoherences and contradictions in Vattel's work are not uncommon. The War of the Spanish Succession can serve as an example of the gulf between doctrinal tradition and practical legal argumentation, or of the instrumental use of history in two distinct elaborations of a shared natural law-framework. Classifying Vattel as a "Tier I"-author and Réal as inferior is not a neutral operation.

Keywords: Legal History, International Law, European History, Political History

JEL Classification: K33

Suggested Citation

Dhondt, Frederik, History in Legal Doctrine. Vattel and Réal De Curban on the Spanish Succession. (June 1, 2015). Forthcoming in: D. De ruysscher, B. Deseure, K. Capelle, M. Colette & G. Van Assche (eds.), Rechtsgeschiedenis op nieuwe wegen. Legal history, moving in new directions. Antwerp: Maklu, 2015. , Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2612973

Frederik Dhondt (Contact Author)

Research Group CORE (Contextual Research in Law) ( email )

Pleinlaan 2
Brussels, Brussels 1050
Belgium
003226291883 (Phone)

HOME PAGE: http://www.vub.be/CORE

Legal History Institute/Gustave Rolin Jaequemyns Institute of International Law (GRILI) ( email )

Universiteitstraat 4
Gent, East Flanders 9000
Belgium
003292649713 (Phone)
003292646707 (Fax)

HOME PAGE: http://www.rechtsgeschiedenis.be

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
96
Abstract Views
1,033
Rank
492,631
PlumX Metrics