Implied Rights and Federalism: Inventing Intentions While Ignoring Them
University of Western Australia Law Review, 34 2: 228-237, 2009
Posted: 19 Jun 2015
Date Written: 2009
Abstract
In this article the author compares Australia’s implied rights cases and division of powers cases, using them to illustrate the role of intentions in interpretation. There is a certain irony, he argues, related to how the High Court adopts different interpretive approaches to these two sorts of cases.
JEL Classification: K00
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Allan, James, Implied Rights and Federalism: Inventing Intentions While Ignoring Them (2009). University of Western Australia Law Review, 34 2: 228-237, 2009, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2620516
Feedback
Feedback to SSRN
If you need immediate assistance, call 877-SSRNHelp (877 777 6435) in the United States, or +1 212 448 2500 outside of the United States, 8:30AM to 6:00PM U.S. Eastern, Monday - Friday.