Comparing Policies to Confront Permit Over-Allocation

Resources for the Future Discussion Paper 15-17

37 Pages Posted: 14 Jul 2015

Date Written: June 25, 2015

Abstract

Instability in cap-and-trade markets, particularly with respect to permit price collapses has been an area of concern for regulators. To that end, several policies, including hybrid price-quantity mechanisms and the newly introduced "market stability reserve" (MSR) systems have been introduced and even implemented in some cases. I develop a stochastic dynamic model of a cap-and-trade system, parameterized to values relevant to the European Union's Emission Trading System (EU ETS) to analyze the performance of these policies aimed at adding stability to the system or at least at reducing perceived over-allocations of permits. Results suggest adaptive-allocation mechanisms such as a price collar or MSR can reduce permit over-allocations and permit price volatility in a more cost-effective manner than simply reducing scheduled permit allocations. However, it is also found that the performance of these adaptive allocation policies, and in particular the MSR, are greatly affected by assumed discount rates and policy parameters.

Keywords: cap-and-trade, market stability reserve, price collar, EU ETS

Suggested Citation

Fell, Harrison G., Comparing Policies to Confront Permit Over-Allocation (June 25, 2015). Resources for the Future Discussion Paper 15-17, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2630112 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2630112

Harrison G. Fell (Contact Author)

Resources for the Future ( email )

1616 P Street, NW
Washington, DC 20036
United States
202-328-5005 (Phone)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
45
Abstract Views
346
PlumX Metrics