Socialization Tactics, Employee Proactivity, and Person-Organization Fit

Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 90, No. 2, 232–241, 2005

11 Pages Posted: 19 Jul 2015 Last revised: 17 Sep 2015

See all articles by Tae-Yeol Kim

Tae-Yeol Kim

China Europe International Business School (CEIBS)

Daniel M. Cable

University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill - Kenan-Flagler Business School

Sang-Pyo Kim

Gyeongsang National University

Date Written: April 1, 2005

Abstract

This study examined the linkage between organizational socialization tactics and person-organization (P-O) fit and examined the moderating influence of employees’ proactivity behaviors. Results from a sample of 279 employee-supervisor pairs from 7 organizations in South Korea revealed a positive relationship between institutionalized socialization tactics and P-O fit perceptions. However, the association between firms’ socialization tactics and P-O fit was facilitated or negated by several proactive behaviors that employees used to gain control over their environment. For example, employees’ positive framing harmonized with institutional tactics to create higher P-O fit, whereas employees who proactively developed strong relationships with their supervisors essentially replaced institutionalized socialization tactics.

Suggested Citation

Kim, Tae-Yeol and Cable, Daniel M. and Kim, Sang-Pyo, Socialization Tactics, Employee Proactivity, and Person-Organization Fit (April 1, 2005). Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 90, No. 2, 232–241, 2005, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2633077

Tae-Yeol Kim (Contact Author)

China Europe International Business School (CEIBS) ( email )

Shanghai-Hongfeng Road
Shanghai 201206
Shanghai 201206
China

Daniel M. Cable

University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill - Kenan-Flagler Business School ( email )

McColl Building
Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3490
United States
919-962-6145 (Phone)

Sang-Pyo Kim

Gyeongsang National University

Chinju City, South Kyongsang
Korea, Republic of (South Korea)

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
94
Abstract Views
754
Rank
503,030
PlumX Metrics