May an Employer Substitute a Sanction Imposed by the Chairperson for its Own? – SARS v CCMA

Journal of Contemporary Roman-Dutch Law, Vol. 78, p. 132-139, 2015

8 Pages Posted: 14 Aug 2015

See all articles by Shamier Ebrahim

Shamier Ebrahim

University of South Africa (UNISA) - School of Law

Date Written: Feabruary 13, 2015

Abstract

The purpose of a disciplinary hearing is to make a finding as to whether or not the employee is guilty of contravening the relevant workplace rule, and if so found, to decide what sanction should be imposed. A problem arises where the employer is dissatisfied with the sanction imposed by the chairperson and wishes to substitute same with its own sanction in circumstances where the disciplinary code does not allow for such substitution. The general rule is that an employer in such circumstances may not unilaterally substitute the sanction of the chairperson for its own.

Keywords: disciplinary hearing, sanction, substitution of sanction

Suggested Citation

Ebrahim, Shamier, May an Employer Substitute a Sanction Imposed by the Chairperson for its Own? – SARS v CCMA (Feabruary 13, 2015). Journal of Contemporary Roman-Dutch Law, Vol. 78, p. 132-139, 2015, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2643362

Shamier Ebrahim (Contact Author)

University of South Africa (UNISA) - School of Law ( email )

Zimbabwe

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
45
Abstract Views
354
PlumX Metrics