A Child's Right to a Family versus a State's Right to Institutionalize the Child
76 Pages Posted: 1 Sep 2015 Last revised: 1 Mar 2018
Date Written: August 31, 2015
Abstract
International law, represented particularly by the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), declares that a child has the right to be raised in a "family environment." Nevertheless, the CRC grants states the discretion to institutionalize children who are without functioning families. States have this discretion because the CRC does not require states to arrange, facilitate, or even allow for child placement in a permanent, substitute family. In this article, I describe this contradiction in international law -- a child's right to a family environment versus the state's discretion to institutionalize the child -- and I explore the possible reasons for the contradiction. A chief reason for the contradiction is anxiety about intercountry adoption. I propose some ways to resolve the contradiction and to pave the way for the creation of a true right to a family, including by placement in a permanent substitute family.
Keywords: Adoption, Intercountry Adoption, International Law, Children' Rights
JEL Classification: K33
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation