Should Monetary Policy Respond Strongly to Output Gaps?
15 Pages Posted: 8 Apr 2001 Last revised: 25 Dec 2022
Date Written: April 2001
Abstract
Much recent monetary policy analysis has featured stochastic simulations with small structural macroeconomic models that include: a spending vs. saving ( IS') sector; a price-adjustment sector; and an interest rate policy rule. The first two are frequently specified so as to reflect optimizing behavior; policy may or may not be specified as optimizing depending on the study's objectives. Some leading issues concern modifications to simple quantitative optimizing models that are needed to generate realistic degrees of persistence in inflation and output-gap variables. A major policy issue is whether it is desirable for monetary policy to respond strongly to the output gap. The paper argues that the latter is unobservable and considers the implications of using a trend-type measure while the true concept is of a type more in keeping with basic theory. In such circumstances, highly undesirable consequences are likely to ensue if policy responds strongly to the measured gap.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Monetary Policy Rules and Macroeconomic Stability: Evidence and Some Theory
By Richard Clarida, Jordi Galí, ...
-
The Science of Monetary Policy: A New Keynesian Perspective
By Richard Clarida, Jordi Galí, ...
-
The Science of Monetary Policy: a New Keynesian Perspective
By Richard Clarida, Jordi Galí, ...
-
An Optimization-Based Econometric Framework for the Evaluation of Monetary Policy: Expanded Version
-
Monetary Policy Rules in Practice: Some International Evidence
By Richard Clarida, Jordi Galí, ...
-
Inflation Forecast Targeting: Implementing and Monitoring Inflation Targets