Is the Principle of Lex Specialis Useful to Resolve the Conflict Between GATT and GATS? Examining the Inclusive Relationship of Subject Matter

Asian Journal of WTO & International Health Law and Policy, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 509-540

32 Pages Posted: 6 Oct 2015

See all articles by Ruibo Yan

Ruibo Yan

Jiangsu Normal University

Date Written: September 29, 2015

Abstract

Although one scholarly approach has suggested that the principle of lex specialis can be used to identify which of the different standards of the GATT or the GATS applies, it nevertheless is arguable that the principle is not useful for reconciling the two agreements. When the relationship between specialis and generalis is being examined, there must initially be an inclusive relationship between them. Moreover, the subject matter of the lex specialis must be included in that of the lex generalis. As the subject matter of the GATT and the GATS cannot constitute an inclusive relationship, one cannot apply the principle of lex specialis to address the subject matter covered by the GATT and the GATS. Therefore, there is no place for the principle of lex specialis to resolve the conflict between the GATT and the GATS.

Keywords: lex specialis, GATT, GATS, norm conflict, inclusive relationship, subject matter

Suggested Citation

Yan, Ruibo, Is the Principle of Lex Specialis Useful to Resolve the Conflict Between GATT and GATS? Examining the Inclusive Relationship of Subject Matter (September 29, 2015). Asian Journal of WTO & International Health Law and Policy, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 509-540, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2669441

Ruibo Yan (Contact Author)

Jiangsu Normal University ( email )

101 Shanghai Rd
Tongshan
Xuzhou, Jiangsu
China

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
167
Abstract Views
1,035
Rank
322,583
PlumX Metrics