A Cross-State Comparison of Measures of Subjective Well-Being

31 Pages Posted: 12 Oct 2015

See all articles by Younghwan Song

Younghwan Song

Union College - Department of Economics

Abstract

Using data drawn from the 2010 American Time Use Survey Well-Being Module, this study examines the relationship between three measures of subjective well-being based on time-use data and an objective measure of well-being. Whereas the measures of affect – net affect and the U-index – are uncorrelated with the objective quality-of-life ranking of the fifty states in the United States, the measure of meaningfulness shows a significant correlation with objective ranking. The reason for the significant correlation between the measure of meaningfulness and the objective measure of well-being is because, when engaged in similar activities, people living in states with better quality of life felt, after controlling for their individual characteristics, their lives to be more meaningful than those living in states with poor amenities, not because time use varies substantially by state.

Keywords: time use, subjective well-being, U-index, net affect, meaningfulness

JEL Classification: I31, J22

Suggested Citation

Song, Younghwan, A Cross-State Comparison of Measures of Subjective Well-Being. IZA Discussion Paper No. 9396, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2672182 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2672182

Younghwan Song (Contact Author)

Union College - Department of Economics ( email )

Schenectady, NY 12308-3107
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
114
Abstract Views
734
Rank
436,129
PlumX Metrics