Excess Commuting in the US: Differences between the Self-Employed and Employees

40 Pages Posted: 19 Oct 2015

See all articles by José Ignacio Giménez-Nadal

José Ignacio Giménez-Nadal

University of Zaragoza

Jose Alberto Molina

University of Zaragoza - Department of Economic Analysis

Jorge Velilla

University of Zaragoza

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a new spatial framework to model excess commuting of workers and we show empirical differences between the self-employed and employees in the US. In a theoretical framework where self-employed workers minimize their commuting time, employees do not minimize their commuting time because they lack full information, and thus the difference between the time devoted to commuting by self-employed workers and employees is modeled as wasteful commuting (i.e., excess commuting). We first formulate a microeconomic framework for commuting by modeling the location of individuals in urban cores surrounded by rings. Using the American Time Use Survey for the years 2003-2013, our empirical results show that employees spend twelve more minutes per day, or forty percent of the average commuting time, compared to their self-employed counterparts. This is consistent with our "diana" model, in that location is an important factor.

Keywords: excess commuting, urban cores, American Time Use Survey, self-employed workers, employees

JEL Classification: R20, R41, J64

Suggested Citation

Giménez-Nadal, José Ignacio and Molina Chueca, Jose Alberto and Velilla, Jorge, Excess Commuting in the US: Differences between the Self-Employed and Employees. IZA Discussion Paper No. 9425, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2675482 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2675482

José Ignacio Giménez-Nadal (Contact Author)

University of Zaragoza ( email )

Gran Via 2
Zaragoza, 50005
Spain

Jose Alberto Molina Chueca

University of Zaragoza - Department of Economic Analysis ( email )

50005 Zaragoza
Spain

Jorge Velilla

University of Zaragoza

Gran Via 2
Zaragoza, 50005
Spain

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
55
Abstract Views
671
Rank
675,679
PlumX Metrics