The RFF Regulatory Performance Initiative: What Have We Learned?

Resources for the Future Discussion Paper 15-47

38 Pages Posted: 1 Nov 2015

Date Written: October 30, 2015

Abstract

Retrospective analysis of federal environmental regulation aims to rigorously document the extent to which key policy objectives have been attained and at what cost. This paper reports the results of nine new case studies involving a total of 34 cost or benefit/effectiveness comparisons from a highly diverse set of environmentally oriented rules. Despite limitations of the case study approach and the non-representative nature of the sample, the results suggest somewhat of a tendency to overestimate both costs and benefits/effectiveness of regulation. Recommendations for revisions to future policy and analysis include: estimation of cost savings and distributional impacts from emissions trading, approaches to new technology development, use of up-to-date baseline information, analysis of prescriptive congressional mandates, federally mandated programs implemented by states, heterogeneity of costs and benefits, and treatment of uncertainty in energy prices and other macro factors. Recommendations also consider enhancements to the federal role in future retrospective analyses.

Keywords: retrospective analysis, regulatory review, benefit-cost analysis

JEL Classification: D61, H1, L51

Suggested Citation

Morgenstern, Richard D., The RFF Regulatory Performance Initiative: What Have We Learned? (October 30, 2015). Resources for the Future Discussion Paper 15-47, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2684009 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2684009

Richard D. Morgenstern (Contact Author)

Resources for the Future ( email )

1616 P Street, NW
Washington, DC 20036
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
56
Abstract Views
701
Rank
665,096
PlumX Metrics