Estimating Causal Effects Using Coarsened Treatments as Instruments

16 Pages Posted: 3 Nov 2015 Last revised: 10 Dec 2015

See all articles by John A. Henderson

John A. Henderson

Yale University, Department of Political Science

Date Written: November 2, 2015

Abstract

Researchers often estimate causal effects in experimental or observational studies after coarsening continuous measures of treatments. In the statistical matching context, in particular, non-discrete interventions are frequently discretized to facilitate pair-stratification using traditional matching approaches for binary treatments. A well-known issue in studying coarsened interventions is that any coarsening induces measurement error that attenuates estimates, while inflating estimator standard errors. While this bias is known, there is yet no standard correction for it. This research note illustrates the error-in-variables structure underlying the use of discrete transformations of non-discrete (or dose) interventions. It also recommends the use of the standard IV estimator to recover an unbiased estimate of the uncoarsened treatment effect. Particular attention is given to the problem of matching with a continuous intervention, which motivates simulations.

Keywords: experiments, matching, continuous interventions, discrete data, instrumental variables, measurement error

Suggested Citation

Henderson, John A., Estimating Causal Effects Using Coarsened Treatments as Instruments (November 2, 2015). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2685357 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2685357

John A. Henderson (Contact Author)

Yale University, Department of Political Science ( email )

493 College St
New Haven, CT CT 06520
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
38
Abstract Views
639
PlumX Metrics