The Doctrine of the Last Antecedent, the Example in Barnhart, Why Both are Weak, and How Textualism Postures

16 Scribes Journal of Legal Writing 5 (2014–2015)

40 Pages Posted: 2 Jul 2016

Date Written: 2015

Abstract

This article criticizes the doctrine (or canon) of the last antecedent, the example in Barnhart v. Thomas (540 U.S. 20) that has spurred its increasing use, and the claim that Justice Scalia’s textualism is objective and politically neutral. To counter this claim, the article summarizes six empirical studies and cites eleven other sources. It also lists a dozen arguments to support the validity and value of legislative history as an aid to interpretation.

Keywords: textualism, judicial interpretation, canons of construction, doctrine of the last antecedent, legislative history

Suggested Citation

Kimble, Joseph, The Doctrine of the Last Antecedent, the Example in Barnhart, Why Both are Weak, and How Textualism Postures (2015). 16 Scribes Journal of Legal Writing 5 (2014–2015), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2686824

Joseph Kimble (Contact Author)

Cooley Law School ( email )

300 S. Capitol Avenue
P.O. Box 13038
Lansing, MI 48901
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
243
Abstract Views
1,180
Rank
228,880
PlumX Metrics