Timing, Sequencing, and Transitional Justice Impact: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Latin America

Human Rights Review, Forthcoming

Posted: 25 Nov 2015

See all articles by Geoff Dancy

Geoff Dancy

Tulane University

Eric Wiebelhaus-Brahm

University of Arkansas at Little Rock

Date Written: November 24, 2015

Abstract

Transitional justice (TJ) scholars are increasingly concerned with measuring the impact of transitional justice initiatives. Scholars often assume that TJ mechanisms must be properly designed and ordered to achieve lasting effect, but the impact of TJ timing and sequencing has attracted relatively little theoretical or empirical attention. Focusing on Latin America, this article explores variation within the region as to when TJ occurs and the order in which mechanisms are implemented. We utilize qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) to assess the impact of TJ timing and sequencing on democratic development. We find little evidence for path dependency owing to the chronological order of mechanisms. We do find, however, that amnesties and trials approach a sufficient condition for democratic consolidation in Latin America; trials, however, come closest to being a necessary condition for successful democratic consolidation.

Keywords: Latin America, Transitional justice, Qualitative comparative analysis, Fuzzy sets, Amnesties, Human rights trials

Suggested Citation

Dancy, Geoff and Wiebelhaus-Brahm, Eric, Timing, Sequencing, and Transitional Justice Impact: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Latin America (November 24, 2015). Human Rights Review, Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2695032

Geoff Dancy

Tulane University ( email )

United States

Eric Wiebelhaus-Brahm (Contact Author)

University of Arkansas at Little Rock ( email )

2801 S University Ave
Little Rock, AR 72204
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
418
PlumX Metrics