Immigration Inside the Law

7 Pages Posted: 29 Nov 2015 Last revised: 25 Jan 2016

See all articles by Josh Blackman

Josh Blackman

South Texas College of Law Houston

Date Written: November 26, 2015

Abstract

To many scholars, paradoxically, practical immigration law has little to do with actual immigration law. Professor Hiroshi Motomura, a leading immigration law professor, admits quite candidly that the “traditional distinction between Congress’s authority to make law and the President’s authority to enforce law — always a very imprecise line to begin with — has little practical meaning” for immigration enforcement. It is no coincidence that Motomura’s magisterial tome is titled Immigration Outside — not inside — The Law.

In this contribution to a symposium on Prof. Motomura’s Foulston Siefkin lecture, I contrast the disconnect between the professoriate’s view on immigration law and that of the Obama Administration. Specifically, I chronicle how the Office of Legal Counsel grounded the legality of Deferred Action for Parents of Americans (“DAPA”) in congressional acquiescence, rather than an unbounded notion of executive power. While I ultimately conclude that OLC’s defense of DAPA fails, at a minimum, its recognition of Congress’s persistent, if not quiet role in cabining executive discretion serves as a powerful refutation of the scholarly consensus of immigration outside the law.

Keywords: Immigration, Constitution, DAPA, OLC

Suggested Citation

Blackman, Josh, Immigration Inside the Law (November 26, 2015). Washburn Law Journal, Vol. 55, 2015, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2695956

Josh Blackman (Contact Author)

South Texas College of Law Houston ( email )

1303 San Jacinto Street
Houston, TX 77002
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
145
Abstract Views
1,055
Rank
362,884
PlumX Metrics