Symbolic-Cognitive Proceduralism: A Model of Deliberative Legitimacy

Journal of Public Deliberation, 11(2), Article 3 (2015)

32 Pages Posted: 29 Nov 2015 Last revised: 12 Dec 2015

See all articles by Robert C. Richards

Robert C. Richards

University of Arkansas Clinton School of Public Service

John Gastil

Pennsylvania State University

Date Written: December 11, 2015

Abstract

Burkhalter et al.’s (2002) self-reinforcing model of democratic deliberation is well established, but lacks an account of legitimacy, which is a key element of most democratic-deliberative theories. We extend Burkhalter et al’s model by proposing a new model called “symbolic-cognitive proceduralism,” which explains how democratic-deliberative processes generate legitimacy, and how such legitimacy contributes to the social reproduction of deliberation. Our proposed model accounts for perceived and normative legitimacy, at interpersonal and macro-social levels of analysis, over short and long time-spans, and accords with substantial empirical evidence.

Keywords: cognition, communication ethics, democratic deliberation, political communication, political knowledge, legitimacy

JEL Classification: D72

Suggested Citation

Richards, Robert C. and Gastil, John, Symbolic-Cognitive Proceduralism: A Model of Deliberative Legitimacy (December 11, 2015). Journal of Public Deliberation, 11(2), Article 3 (2015), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2696197

Robert C. Richards (Contact Author)

University of Arkansas Clinton School of Public Service ( email )

1200 President Clinton Ave
Little Rock, AR 72201
United States

John Gastil

Pennsylvania State University ( email )

University Park, PA 16802
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
61
Abstract Views
929
Rank
643,003
PlumX Metrics