Can Nature Serve as a Criterium for the Use of Reproductive Technologies?

In: E. Hildt, D. Mieth (Eds.) (1998) in Vitro Fertilisation in the 1990s: Towards a Medical, Social and Ethical Evaluation. Aldershot: Ashgate, 349-360

12 Pages Posted: 14 Dec 2015

See all articles by Hub Zwart

Hub Zwart

Radboud University Nijmegen, Faculty of Science, ISIS; EUR

Date Written: 1998

Abstract

Contemporary ethical discourse is faced with a remarkable ambiguity. On the one hand, we find the human subject thoroughly de-naturalized. Self-determination is regarded as the starting-point for moral decision-making, human nature is reduced to being free and reasonable, and the idea that nature might serve as a criterium for moral behaviour or as a standard for moral guidance seems to have lost all credibility. On the other hand, however, we are faced with the opposite effort as well, namely to naturalize the human being, considering him solely in biological terms and reducing him to one particular species among others, displaying a life-pattern that can be described in purely instinctual terms.

Keywords: bioethics, naturalness, reproductive technologies, post-menopausal IVF, self-determination

Suggested Citation

Zwart, Hub, Can Nature Serve as a Criterium for the Use of Reproductive Technologies? (1998). In: E. Hildt, D. Mieth (Eds.) (1998) in Vitro Fertilisation in the 1990s: Towards a Medical, Social and Ethical Evaluation. Aldershot: Ashgate, 349-360, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2700920

Hub Zwart (Contact Author)

Radboud University Nijmegen, Faculty of Science, ISIS ( email )

P.O. Box 9010
Nijmegen, 6500GL
Netherlands

HOME PAGE: http://www.filosofie.science.ru.nl/

EUR ( email )

Burgemeester Oudlaan 50
3000 DR Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland 3062PA
Netherlands

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
23
Abstract Views
498
PlumX Metrics