The Effect of Prison Sentence Length on Recidivism: Evidence from Random Judicial Assignment

29 Pages Posted: 12 Dec 2015 Last revised: 21 May 2016

Date Written: December 9, 2015

Abstract

Whether punishment promotes or deters future criminal activity by the convicted offender is a key public policy concern. Longer prison sentences further isolate offenders from the legitimate labor force and may promote the formation of criminal networks in prison. On the other hand, greater initial punishment may have a deterrence effect on the individual being punished, sometimes called “specific deterrence,” through learning or the rehabilitative effect of prison. We test the effect of prison sentence length on recidivism by exploiting a unique quasi-experimental design from adult sentences within a courthouse in Seattle, Washington. Offenders who plead guilty are randomly assigned to a sentencing judge, which leads to random differences in prison sentence length depending on the sentencing judge’s proclivities. We find that one-month extra prison sentence reduces the rate of recidivism by about one percentage point, with possibly larger effects for those with limited criminal histories. However, the reduction in recidivism comes almost entirely in the first year of release, which we interpret as consistent with prison’s rehabilitative role.

Keywords: Deterrence, specific deterrence, judging, crime, recidivism

JEL Classification: K14

Suggested Citation

Roach, Michael A and Schanzenbach, Max Matthew, The Effect of Prison Sentence Length on Recidivism: Evidence from Random Judicial Assignment (December 9, 2015). Northwestern Law & Econ Research Paper No. 16-08, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2701549 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2701549

Michael A Roach

Middle Tennessee State University ( email )

P.O. Box 50
Murfreesboro, TN 37132
United States

Max Matthew Schanzenbach (Contact Author)

Northwestern University - Pritzker School of Law ( email )

375 E. Chicago Ave
Chicago, IL 60611
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
1,322
Abstract Views
5,975
Rank
28,112
PlumX Metrics