A Century of Missing Trade?
22 Pages Posted: 17 May 2001 Last revised: 9 Mar 2022
Date Written: May 2001
Abstract
In contemporary data, the measured factor content of trade is far smaller than its predicted magnitude in the pure Heckscher-Ohlin-Vanek framework, the so-called 'missing trade' mystery. We wonder if this problem has been there from the beginning: that is, we ask if the Heckscher-Ohlin theory was so much at odds with reality at its time of conception. We apply contemporary tests to historical data, focusing on the major trading zone that inspired the factor abundance theory, the Old and New Worlds of the pre-1914 'Greater Atlantic' economy. This places our analysis in a very different context than contemporary studies: an era with lower trade barriers, higher transport costs, a more skewed global distribution of the relevant factors (especially land), and comparably large productivity divergence. These conditions might seem more favorable to the theory, but the results are still very poor.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Technology, Factor Supplies and International Specialization: Estimating the Neoclassical Model
-
Do Endowments Predict the Location of Production? Evidence from National and International Data
-
One Size Fits All? Heckscher-Ohlin Specialization in Global Production
-
The Heckscher-Ohlin-Vanek Model of Trade: Why Does it Fail? When Does it Work?
By Donald R. Davis, David E. Weinstein, ...
-
Increasing Returns and All that: A View from Trade
By Werner Antweiler and Daniel Trefler
-
Estimation of Cross-Country Differences in Industry Production Functions
-
Specialization and the Volume of Trade: Do the Data Obey the Laws?