Reforming Intra-EU Investment Protection: Amid a Running Battle of Interests

Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 22.5 (2015) 732-750

Posted: 23 Dec 2015 Last revised: 28 Dec 2015

See all articles by Dominik Moskvan

Dominik Moskvan

University of Antwerp - Faculty of Law, Business & Law Research Group

Date Written: December 22, 2015

Abstract

This article scrutinizes the positions of stakeholders in the light of the arguments of incompatibility of the intra-EU BITs with EU law. Whereas the interest of the Commission and some EU Member States was to protect the legal certainty of EU law and budgetary expenditures, the selective short-term interest of deliberately invoking compliance with EU law conflicts with the long-term interests of the Union, the EU Member States, and investors, including enterprises wholly-owned by the national governments of EU Member State. While waiting for the Commission to come up with a solution to the issue of incompatibility, EU Member States might find themselves exposed to a substantial degree of moral hazard since Member States’ courts should set aside the enforcement of arbitral awards that ignore the primacy of EU law. It is suggested that the tension between different interests may impact the competitiveness of the investment environment of the EU as a whole.

Keywords: bilateral investment treaties, investment arbitration, investor interest, moral hazard, public interest

Suggested Citation

Moskvan, Dominik, Reforming Intra-EU Investment Protection: Amid a Running Battle of Interests (December 22, 2015). Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 22.5 (2015) 732-750, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2707161

Dominik Moskvan (Contact Author)

University of Antwerp - Faculty of Law, Business & Law Research Group ( email )

Antwerp
Belgium

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
344
PlumX Metrics