EU Migration Policy and its Constitutional Rationale: A Cosmopolitan Outlook

Common Market Law Review Vol. 50 (2013), pp. 709-736

29 Pages Posted: 2 Apr 2016

See all articles by Daniel Thym

Daniel Thym

University of Konstanz - Faculty of Law

Date Written: March 29, 2013

Abstract

There is much confusion among EU experts about the legal status of third-country nationals. This is hardly surprising, since this uncertainty reflects conceptual tensions at the heart of the European project. For half a century, European integration has been defined by the abolition of borders. Through-out Europe borders have been erased both legally under the fundamental freedoms and physically through the creation of the Schengen area. Against this background it was no far fetched assumption that the European Union would grant workers from Ukraine or spouses from Algeria similar rights as EU citizens living in another Member State. Yet, Europe’s mission of promoting transnational freedom is not replicated in the area of freedom, security and justice. Instead of dismantling borders, EU activities re-confirm the relevance of borders towards third states – both physically through external border controls and legally under the emerging EU immigration and asylum acquis. This article identifies underlying motives and resolves the puzzle by proposing a positive constitutional rationale for the substantive rules of European migration policy.

Keywords: EU, immigration, asylum, fundamental rights, border control

Suggested Citation

Thym, Daniel, EU Migration Policy and its Constitutional Rationale: A Cosmopolitan Outlook (March 29, 2013). Common Market Law Review Vol. 50 (2013), pp. 709-736, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2756080

Daniel Thym (Contact Author)

University of Konstanz - Faculty of Law ( email )

Universitaetsstrasse 10
Konstanz, 78457
Germany

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
140
Abstract Views
554
Rank
372,809
PlumX Metrics