Illegality as a Defence in Contract

20 Pages Posted: 6 Apr 2016

See all articles by Andrew Burrows

Andrew Burrows

University of Oxford - Faculty of Law

Date Written: April 3, 2016

Abstract

The English law on illegality as a defence across the law of obligations is in a mess. There have been three recent UK Supreme Court decisions (and we await another) which have, so far, failed to cut through the difficulties. This paper focuses on the core question as regards illegality as a defence in contract: which is, what is the impact of criminal conduct on the enforceability of a contract? It begins by explaining why illegality is such a difficult topic. It goes on to draw a critical distinction between two exercises (or stages): the legislative effect on the contract of the criminal conduct and its effect on the contract at common law. It goes on to favour a multifactorial approach to the effect at common law in preference to a rule-based approach (including the reliance rule favoured by the House of Lords in Tinsley v Milligan [1994] 1 AC 340); and it explains how that preferred approach would apply to some hypothetical examples.

Keywords: contract; illegality; defence;

Suggested Citation

Burrows, Andrew Stephen, Illegality as a Defence in Contract (April 3, 2016). Oxford Legal Studies Research Paper No. 15/2016, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2758797 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2758797

Andrew Stephen Burrows (Contact Author)

University of Oxford - Faculty of Law ( email )

St. Cross Building
St. Cross Road
Oxford, OX1 3UJ
United Kingdom

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
590
Abstract Views
2,515
Rank
84,577
PlumX Metrics