Improving the Current Law of Warrantless Cellphone Searches after R. v. Fearon

49 Revue Juridique Thémis 825, 2015

12 Pages Posted: 11 Jul 2016

See all articles by Terry Skolnik

Terry Skolnik

University of Ottawa, Faculty of Law, Civil Law Section

Date Written: 2016

Abstract

Can police officers conduct warrantless searches of a person’s cellphone incidental to arrest? Following the landmark Supreme Court of Canada decision in R v Fearon, the answer is yes. The case undoubtedly marks one of the most significant expansions of police powers to conduct invasive searches affecting a person’s intimate privacy interests. While the majority of the Court in Fearon has attempted to circumscribe the power in order for it to meet the constitutional right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure, the current state of the law lacks certain oversight mechanisms which are easy to implement and which would provide increased constitutional protection to persons whose cellphones are searched. This case comment begins by discussing the facts in Fearon, followed by the majority and dissenting opinions. Next, the implications of this decision and concerns related to the majority’s ruling are analyzed. The case comment concludes with two recommendations on how to better constrain the power of cellphone searches incidental to arrest.

Keywords: Cellphone searches, cellphone, police, warrantless search, Canadian Charter, police powers

JEL Classification: K14

Suggested Citation

Skolnik, Terry, Improving the Current Law of Warrantless Cellphone Searches after R. v. Fearon (2016). 49 Revue Juridique Thémis 825, 2015, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2765733

Terry Skolnik (Contact Author)

University of Ottawa, Faculty of Law, Civil Law Section ( email )

57 Louis Pasteur Dr
Ottawa
Canada

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
151
Abstract Views
704
Rank
351,123
PlumX Metrics