Swinging at the Facts: How Baseball Informs Legal Argument

20 Pages Posted: 31 May 2016

See all articles by Josephine R. Potuto

Josephine R. Potuto

University of Nebraska at Lincoln - College of Law

Date Written: May 30, 2016

Abstract

In this article, I use baseball as a springboard for discussing persuasive legal argument. In particular, I compare a lawyer making a legal argument to a batter at the plate. A batter with a well-made bat is poised to hit, but he or she still must connect with the ball. A lawyer with an accurate and complete rendition of applicable black letter law is poised to craft a persuasive argument, but he or she still must connect with the facts. The article was great fun to write (especially the footnotes), and, I hope, will be fun to read. I also hope it is instructive on the subject of written advocacy and also on the subject of baseball. Baseball long has held fascination for legal scholars. This article joins the long line of law review articles that use baseball as focus or jumping off point.

Keywords: baseball, argument, legal writing, persuasive argument, lawyering, legal profession

Suggested Citation

Potuto, Josephine R., Swinging at the Facts: How Baseball Informs Legal Argument (May 30, 2016). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2786676 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2786676

Josephine R. Potuto (Contact Author)

University of Nebraska at Lincoln - College of Law ( email )

103 McCollum Hall
P.O. Box 830902
Lincoln, NE 68583-0902
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
63
Abstract Views
755
Rank
627,735
PlumX Metrics