The Limits of Free Speech: Democratic Legitimacy in Canada and New Zealand

44 Pages Posted: 6 Jun 2016 Last revised: 11 Jun 2016

See all articles by Alexander Winsley

Alexander Winsley

Victoria University of Wellington, Te Herenga Waka - Faculty of Law, Student/Alumni

Date Written: 2013

Abstract

This paper explores the balancing act between freedom of expression and hate speech. It takes its cue from a recent dialogue between Ronald Dworkin and Jeremy Waldron concerning democratic legitimacy. This dialogue forms the conceptual starting point for the paper, and a detailed analysis of democratic principles will follow. Robert Post’s participatory theory of democracy is critiqued, and his recent conversion to democratic relativism is analysed. The operation of hate speech laws in Canada and New Zealand will both be assessed in order to see how both of these countries treat the issue of democratic legitimacy.

Keywords: hate speech, Freedom of Expression, Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, 1982 New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990

JEL Classification: K10

Suggested Citation

Winsley, Alexander, The Limits of Free Speech: Democratic Legitimacy in Canada and New Zealand (2013). Victoria University of Wellington Legal Research Paper, Student/Alumni Paper No. 25/2016, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2790666

Alexander Winsley (Contact Author)

Victoria University of Wellington, Te Herenga Waka - Faculty of Law, Student/Alumni ( email )

PO Box 600
Wellington, 6140
New Zealand

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
111
Abstract Views
602
Rank
448,285
PlumX Metrics