Regulating ADR: Lessons from the UK

Pablo Cortes (ed.) The New Regulatory Framework for Consumer Alternative Dispute Resolution (OUP, 2016) Forthcoming

University of Leicester School of Law Research Paper No. 16/26

34 Pages Posted: 11 Jun 2016 Last revised: 12 Oct 2022

See all articles by Richard Kirkham

Richard Kirkham

University of Sheffield - Faculty of Law

Date Written: June 9, 2016

Abstract

This chapter analyses the manner in which the ADR Directive and ODR Regulation have been implemented in the UK, with a particular focus on the ombudsman sector. The chapter argues that in the UK implementation has been minimalist and that this represents a missed opportunity. The Directive is capable of laying the foundations for robust ADR, but the regulation of the sector looks deficient. As a result, there is a heightened risk that sub-optimal standards in the sector will go undetected which may in turn undermine user confidence. More work needs to be done to make the regulatory set-up a standard-bearer for the sector rather than a passive observer.

Keywords: Ombudsman, Regulation, Standards, ADR Directive

Suggested Citation

Kirkham, Richard, Regulating ADR: Lessons from the UK (June 9, 2016). Pablo Cortes (ed.) The New Regulatory Framework for Consumer Alternative Dispute Resolution (OUP, 2016) Forthcoming, University of Leicester School of Law Research Paper No. 16/26, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2793440 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2793440

Richard Kirkham (Contact Author)

University of Sheffield - Faculty of Law ( email )

Crookesmoor Building, Conduit Road
Sheffield S10 1FL
United Kingdom

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
134
Abstract Views
1,057
Rank
388,839
PlumX Metrics