Loan Loss Accounting and Procyclical Bank Lending: The Role of Direct Regulatory Actions

72 Pages Posted: 1 Jul 2016 Last revised: 20 Jan 2021

See all articles by Barrett Wheeler

Barrett Wheeler

Tulane University - Accounting & Taxation

Date Written: January 30, 2019

Abstract

I provide evidence that loan loss accounting affects procyclical lending through its impact on regulatory actions. Regulators are more likely to place banks with inadequate loan loss allowances under enforcement actions that restrict lending, leading these banks to lend less during downturns. Further, I find that banks with lower regulatory ratings lend less when they have more timely provisions, consistent with research theorizing that timely provisions increase transparency and inhibit regulatory forbearance. This regulatory action mechanism expands on prior research that has focused on the effect of loan loss recognition on regulatory capital adequacy during economic downturns.

Keywords: Banking, allowance for loan losses, loan loss provisions, regulation, procyclicality

JEL Classification: G18, G21, G28, M41

Suggested Citation

Wheeler, Barrett, Loan Loss Accounting and Procyclical Bank Lending: The Role of Direct Regulatory Actions (January 30, 2019). Journal of Accounting & Economics (JAE), Forthcoming, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2802309 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2802309

Barrett Wheeler (Contact Author)

Tulane University - Accounting & Taxation ( email )

United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
228
Abstract Views
1,474
Rank
245,297
PlumX Metrics