Chinese Law and Governance: Moving beyond Responsive Authoritarianism and the Rule of Law

The Journal of Chinese Governance, Volume 1, Number 3 (September 2016): 457-469

Posted: 14 Jul 2016 Last revised: 26 Aug 2016

See all articles by William Hurst

William Hurst

Northwestern University - Department of Political Science

Date Written: August 19, 2016

Abstract

In his essay, Francis Fukuyama offers a vision of Chinese governance that I contend is flawed is at least three important respects: the basic framework of his three pillars (and in particular his conception of the rule of law), his characterization of the Chinese legal system, and his assumption of the strength (and even agility and responsiveness) of China’s bureaucratic state structure. After examining his arguments, I outline a different framework, drawn from my current research, which I call legal regimes and explain how it can be applied to understand the contemporary realities of China’s legal system. I also draw on my recent findings to challenge any assumptions of state strength or resilience, before examining the implications for current Chinese politics and possible future trajectories.

Keywords: Rule of Law, Politics, Authoritarianism, Governance, China

Suggested Citation

Hurst, William, Chinese Law and Governance: Moving beyond Responsive Authoritarianism and the Rule of Law (August 19, 2016). The Journal of Chinese Governance, Volume 1, Number 3 (September 2016): 457-469, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2808961

William Hurst (Contact Author)

Northwestern University - Department of Political Science ( email )

601 University Place (Scott Hall)
Evanston, IL 60201
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
453
PlumX Metrics