Choosing a Good Toolkit, II: Simulations and Conclusions

44 Pages Posted: 25 Jul 2016

See all articles by Alejandro Francetich

Alejandro Francetich

UW Bothell School of Business

David M. Kreps

Stanford Graduate School of Business

Date Written: July 21, 2016

Abstract

This paper continues our study of heuristics employed to choose dynamically tools to put in a toolkit, where the value of any tool can be discovered only by choosing it. This is a multi-armed bandit problem with “arms” that are not independent, hence it is a problem for which the optimal solution is virtually impossible to find. We study the relative performance of a number of heuristic decision rules for discount factors from 0.7 to 0.99 via simulation in the context of a small number of test problems, learning the strengths and weaknesses of the various heuristics.

Keywords: Heuristics, multi-armed bandits, behavioral decision making

JEL Classification: C63, D03, D83, D90

Suggested Citation

Francetich, Alejandro and Kreps, David M., Choosing a Good Toolkit, II: Simulations and Conclusions (July 21, 2016). Stanford University Graduate School of Business Research Paper No. 16-39, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2813463 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2813463

Alejandro Francetich (Contact Author)

UW Bothell School of Business ( email )

Bothell, WA
United States

David M. Kreps

Stanford Graduate School of Business ( email )

655 Knight Way
Stanford, CA 94305-5015
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
79
Abstract Views
609
Rank
559,428
PlumX Metrics