Absorption Capacity, Structural Similarity and Embodied Technology Spillovers in a 'Macro' Model: An Implementation within the Gtap Framework
CoPS and Impact Project Working Paper No. IP-77
59 Pages Posted: 1 Sep 2001
Date Written: December 2000
Abstract
In this paper, all technology transfers are embodied in trade flows within a three-region, one-traded-commodity version of the GTAP model. Exogenous Hicks-Neutral technical progress in one region can have uneven impacts on productivity elsewhere. Why? Destination regions' ability to harness new technology depends on their absorptive capacity and the structural congruence of the source and destination. Together with trade volume, these two factors determine the recipient's spillover coefficient (which measures its success in capturing foreign technology). Armington competition between the outputs of the three economies and shifts in their terms of trade loom large in the general equilibrium adjustment.
Keywords: Absorption Capacity, Capture Parameter, Trade, Technology Spillover, and CGE
JEL Classification: D58, F1, O3
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
By David T. Coe and Elhanan Helpman
-
By David T. Coe
-
International R&D Spillovers and Institutions
By David T. Coe, Elhanan Helpman, ...
-
International R&D Spillovers and Institutions
By David T. Coe, Elhanan Helpman, ...
-
International R&D Spillovers and Institutions
By David T. Coe, Elhanan Helpman, ...
-
Are There International R&D Spillovers Among Randomly Matched Trade Partners?: A Response to Keller
-
By David T. Coe, Elhanan Helpman, ...