‘Income Management and Indigenous Women – A New Chapter of Patriarchal Colonial Governance?’

(2016) 29(2) University of New South Wales Law Journal 843-878

36 Pages Posted: 16 Aug 2016

See all articles by Shelley Bielefeld

Shelley Bielefeld

School of Regulation and Global Governance (RegNet); Griffith University - Griffith Law School

Date Written: July 27, 2016

Abstract

Recent years have seen neoliberal austerity measures rise to prominence in Australia and other western nations, resulting in an erosion of welfare recipients’ rights to access non-stigmatised resource redistribution. This article focuses on intersections between race, gender and class in the context of cashless welfare transfers, referred to in Australia as income management, as most welfare recipients subject to it are Indigenous woman who have been portrayed in a negative way by discourses of passivity, incapacity and vulnerability. Australia’s special brand of austerity for (mostly) Indigenous welfare recipients has been a government issued BasicsCard that quarantines fifty per cent (or more) of welfare payments that can only be spent on government defined priority needs at government approved merchants. Income management has created considerable problems that remain unaddressed and unacknowledged by those responsible for welfare reform. Other countries interested in adopting a similar system of cashless welfare transfers, such as the United Kingdom, might learn from mistakes made by Australian law and policymakers responsible for income management.

Keywords: Austerity, Cashless Welfare Transfers, Neoliberalism, New Paternalism, Indigenous Peoples, Income Management, Colonialism, Intersectionality, Race, Gender, Class

JEL Classification: K39

Suggested Citation

Bielefeld, Shelley and Bielefeld, Shelley, ‘Income Management and Indigenous Women – A New Chapter of Patriarchal Colonial Governance?’ (July 27, 2016). (2016) 29(2) University of New South Wales Law Journal 843-878, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2824294

Shelley Bielefeld (Contact Author)

Griffith University - Griffith Law School ( email )

Nathan Campus, GU
Nathan 4111
Australia

School of Regulation and Global Governance (RegNet) ( email )

Canberra, Australian Capital Territory 2601
Australia

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
66
Abstract Views
469
Rank
617,383
PlumX Metrics