Professional Ethics, Personal Conscience, and Public Expectations

The Journal of Clinical Ethics 27, no. 3 (Fall 2016): 233-7

Posted: 30 Sep 2016

See all articles by Claudia E. Haupt

Claudia E. Haupt

Northeastern University - School of Law; Yale University - Yale Information Society Project

Date Written: September 28, 2016

Abstract

Examining to what extent physicians are, or ought to be, defined by the profession when giving advice to patients, this commentary seeks to offer a better understanding of the potential conflicts that the American Medical Association’s (AMA’s) “Opinion 1.1.7, Physician Exercise of Conscience,” addresses. This commentary conceptualizes the professions as knowledge communities, and situates the physician-patient relationship within this larger conceptual framework. So doing, it sheds light on how and when specialized knowledge is operationalized in professional advice-giving. Physicians communicate the knowledge community’s insights to the patient. Thus, departures from professional knowledge as a matter of the professional’s personal conscience are appropriately circumscribed by the knowledge community.

Keywords: health law, First Amendment, professional speech, professional ethics, law & religion

JEL Classification: K10, K13, K20, K32

Suggested Citation

Haupt, Claudia E., Professional Ethics, Personal Conscience, and Public Expectations (September 28, 2016). The Journal of Clinical Ethics 27, no. 3 (Fall 2016): 233-7, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2844803

Claudia E. Haupt (Contact Author)

Northeastern University - School of Law ( email )

416 Huntington Avenue
Boston, MA 02115
United States

Yale University - Yale Information Society Project ( email )

127 Wall Street
New Haven, CT 06511
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
835
PlumX Metrics