Why Lobby Congress? Constitutive and Instrumental Influences on Indian Groups’ Strategies for Federal Recognition, 1977-2012

37 Pages Posted: 6 Oct 2016 Last revised: 11 Nov 2016

Date Written: September 15, 2016

Abstract

When and why do marginalized groups chose a particular institutional venue when pursuing their legal claims? This article combines theoretical and methodological insights from sociolegal and interest group studies to investigate why non-federally recognized Indian groups used legislative strategies for federal recognition from 1977 to 2012. It finds Indian groups employed legislative strategies both to increase their chances of success and for constitutive purposes, including educating the public and leveraging institutional tensions. The article’s emphasis on constitutive and instrumental motivations provides a more nuanced approach to understanding marginalized groups’ venue decisions.

Suggested Citation

Carlson, Kirsten Matoy, Why Lobby Congress? Constitutive and Instrumental Influences on Indian Groups’ Strategies for Federal Recognition, 1977-2012 (September 15, 2016). Wayne State University Law School Research Paper No. 2016-25, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2847160 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2847160

Kirsten Matoy Carlson (Contact Author)

Wayne State University Law School ( email )

471 Palmer
Detroit, MI 48202
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
133
Abstract Views
579
Rank
387,988
PlumX Metrics