Affect Theory and the Empirical

Posted: 27 Oct 2016

See all articles by Danilyn Rutherford

Danilyn Rutherford

University of California, Santa Cruz - Department of Anthropology

Date Written: October 2016

Abstract

This review article approaches the turn to affect theory as diagnostic of broader currents in cultural anthropology. This is a time of increased curiosity within the subfield. It is also a time of increased anxiety, as researchers feel mounting pressure to make a case for the empirical value of what they do. Affect theory seems to offer cultural anthropologists a way of getting to the bottom of things: to the forces that compel, attract, and provoke. And yet what affect theory is offering cultural anthropologists may be less an account of how the world works than a new awareness of the premises that guide their research. I base these observations on a discussion of recent ethnographies that deploy affect theory in the study of labor, governance, and animal–human relations. I conclude with an assessment of the risks and opportunities associated with the adoption of theoretical models from other fields.

Suggested Citation

Rutherford, Danilyn, Affect Theory and the Empirical (October 2016). Annual Review of Anthropology, Vol. 45, pp. 285-300, 2016, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2858841 or http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102215-095843

Danilyn Rutherford (Contact Author)

University of California, Santa Cruz - Department of Anthropology ( email )

Santa Cruz, CA 95064
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Abstract Views
488
PlumX Metrics