Do Factor Endowments Matter for North-North Trade?
49 Pages Posted: 4 Oct 2001 Last revised: 10 Apr 2022
Date Written: October 2001
Abstract
The dominant paradigm of world trade patterns posits two principal features. Trade between North and South arises due to traditional comparative advantage, largely determined by differences in endowment patterns. Trade within the North, much of it intra-industry trade, is based on economies of scale and product differentiation. The paradigm specifically denies an important role for endowment differences in determining North-North trade. This paper provides the first sound empirical examination of this question. We demonstrate that trade in factor services among countries of the North is systematically related to endowment differences and large in economic magnitude. Intra-industry trade, rather than being a puzzle for a factor endowments theory, is instead the conduit for a great deal of this factor service trade.
Suggested Citation: Suggested Citation
Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?
Recommended Papers
-
Technology, Factor Supplies and International Specialization: Estimating the Neoclassical Model
-
Do Endowments Predict the Location of Production? Evidence from National and International Data
-
One Size Fits All? Heckscher-Ohlin Specialization in Global Production
-
The Heckscher-Ohlin-Vanek Model of Trade: Why Does it Fail? When Does it Work?
By Donald R. Davis, David E. Weinstein, ...
-
Increasing Returns and All that: A View from Trade
By Werner Antweiler and Daniel Trefler
-
Estimation of Cross-Country Differences in Industry Production Functions
-
Specialization and the Volume of Trade: Do the Data Obey the Laws?