Unilateral Conduct and Standards

Jorge L Contreras ed., The Cambridge Handbook of Technical Standardization Law, Vol. 1 – Antitrust and Patents, Cambridge University Press (2017 Forthcoming)

18 Pages Posted: 12 Nov 2016

See all articles by Daryl Lim

Daryl Lim

Pennsylvania State University, Dickinson Law; Fordham University - Fordham Intellectual Property Institute

Date Written: November 9, 2016

Abstract

This chapter examines how antitrust law and patent law have responded to unilateral conduct by patentees in the standards context. A patentee who legitimately wins the market may improperly leverage on its monopoly power to exclude rivals. Similarly, providing the best-in-breed technology cannot excuse patentees who practice patent ambush. Deception corrupts the competitive process by which SSOs select the best-in-breed technology at a competitive price. If patentees seek to leverage on collaborative standardization, they must accept both the benefit and burdens of that process.

Keywords: Ambush, antitrust, estoppel, FRAND, SSO, patent misuse, waiver

Suggested Citation

Lim, Daryl, Unilateral Conduct and Standards (November 9, 2016). Jorge L Contreras ed., The Cambridge Handbook of Technical Standardization Law, Vol. 1 – Antitrust and Patents, Cambridge University Press (2017 Forthcoming), Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2867103

Daryl Lim (Contact Author)

Pennsylvania State University, Dickinson Law ( email )

150 S College St
Carlisle, PA 17013
United States

HOME PAGE: http://lawdaryl.com

Fordham University - Fordham Intellectual Property Institute ( email )

150 West 62nd Street, Rm 7-145
New York, NY 10023
United States

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
180
Abstract Views
817
Rank
304,411
PlumX Metrics