Micro and Macro Financial Supervision: Is the Present Model of Financial Regulation Destructive?

12 Pages Posted: 18 Nov 2016 Last revised: 17 Jan 2017

See all articles by Jan Hendrik Dalhuisen

Jan Hendrik Dalhuisen

King’s College London; University of California, Berkeley; Catolica Global School of Law Lisbon

Date Written: November 17, 2016

Abstract

Banking regulation has undergone substantial reforms after the 2008 financial crisis. In spite of these developments, European banks, especially, continue to experience serious difficulties. Central banks still operate in crisis mode and banks do not serve as intermediaries aimed at providing markets with sufficient liquidity. Stress tests prove inadequate. Capital adequacy rules requiring banks to rebuild capital at the bottom of the market are counterproductive and the new liquidity requirements constrain the business further. Modern bank rescue and resolution regimes are ineffective and may promote early bank runs and bail-out mechanisms are reinstated. A different approach is needed, and this lecture analyses whether macro-prudential supervision can provide answers and how it should be designed to provide solutions.

Suggested Citation

Dalhuisen, Jan Hendrik, Micro and Macro Financial Supervision: Is the Present Model of Financial Regulation Destructive? (November 17, 2016). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2871349

Jan Hendrik Dalhuisen (Contact Author)

King’s College London ( email )

London

University of California, Berkeley ( email )

Berkeley, CA
United States

Catolica Global School of Law Lisbon ( email )

Palma de Cima
Lisbon, 1649-023
Portugal

Do you have negative results from your research you’d like to share?

Paper statistics

Downloads
40
Abstract Views
412
PlumX Metrics